|
 |
Variety
Vista
CONECA’s online center for all
things die variety
The RPM Report:
1980-D&S 1c OMM-001 =
Debunked |
|

|
 |
|
|
|


|
Recently an EMDS specimen was examined and it proved conclusively
that this variety is the result of damage to the die and NOT from an
errant S mintmark punch. The coin and photo was passed around to
the die variety attributers and it was their unanimous decision to
delist this variety from their files.
|
Photographs
|
|
Stage A Photos |
 |
 |
|
Date and Mintmark |
Mintmark Positioning |
 |
|
Magnified Die Damage
|
|
|
Stage C Photos |
 |
 |
|
Date and Mintmark |
Mintmark Positioning |
 |
 |
|
Magnified Die Damage |
No Die Scratch in Lower N of UNITED
|
|
Top of Page |
Die Stage and
Markers Chart
|
|
Die Stages and
Markers
|
|
UVC-1092 |
DMR-003 |
Stage A: |
Apparent S mintmark is clearly die damage – EMDS
Reverse is EMDS |
| |
|
Stage B: |
Obverse is
MDS
Light die scratch in lower N of UNITED – MDS |
| |
|
Stage C: |
Obverse and Reverse are LDS |
|
Top of Page
|
|
|
|
Value and
Population Chart
|
|
Value and
Population |
|
G |
VG |
F |
VF |
40 |
45 |
50 |
53 |
55 |
58 |
60 |
61 |
62 |
63 |
64 |
65 |
66 |
67 |
68 |
69 |
70 |
|
Value |
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANACS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| NGC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
5 |
11 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
PCGS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
5 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
Top of Page |
|
| Home |
Design Varieties |
Mintmark Styles |
The Split Image |
The RPM Report |
| The Book Store
| About CONECA
| About the Author |
|
|
Copyright CONECA, 2007 Email:
jameswiles@sbcglobal.net
1490 Trail View Lane
Frisco, TX 75034-2649 |